Protecting culture should be a UN goal — and a human one

This article was first published by the Financial Times.

Protecting culture is low as a political priority. Across the world, big money is made out of the illegal removal, trafficking and trading of objects from temples or ancient monuments. Antiquities and sculptures of religious or cultural significance and artistic magnificence have become a commodity. There are international treaties and national laws in place to tackle this, yet it continues to happen.

Take, for example, the failure to prevent looting, trafficking and trade in Syrian artefacts under the regime of Bashar al-Assad. Syria now desperately needs the means to grow a sustainable economy and create jobs. Tourism is one route for this: its cultural heritage would certainly attract visitors. International aid funding understandably prioritises medical aid and other essentials. But the current post-Assad context, no matter how fragile, is an opportunity to promote the unofficial SDG Goal 18, in ways that are led and staffed by Syrian civil society. This will also provide employment opportunities for locals as the country recovers from decades of repression, conflict and a decimated narco-economy.

Another potential benefit is for reparations for the damage of colonialism and slavery. This is not only about money. Repatriating brutally removed antiquities, changing how histories are told, co-curation between the museums of former colonised and colonising countries are all part of this. Putting culture in the SDGs could emphasise this.