Trans-Inclusive Culture Update

This article was first published by The University of Leicester.

Trans-Inclusive culture guidance has now been updated to include information about the Supreme Court Ruling and draft EHRC guidance.

This guidance has been developed by the University of Leicester’s Research Centre for Museums and Galleries (RCMG) with legal scholars and trans inclusion and equality experts in the context of growing uncertainty and anxiety surrounding trans-inclusive practice across heritage, arts and cultural organisations of all kinds. The guidance, intended primarily for anyone working with or in museums, galleries, archives and heritage, sets out an ethical framework to support cultural organisations to advance trans inclusion. It explains some key components of the UK law, as well as some of the limitations and complexities of the law. Developed in full, the actions and strategies shared in the guidance will assist staff, volunteers, freelancers, managers and trustees to work together to positively impact the experiences of trans individuals and communities.


Under the 2010 Equality Act, which includes a Public Sector Equality Duty public sector cultural organisations in the UK already have a legal responsibility to eliminate discrimination, advance equality of opportunity for those with protected characteristics and foster good relations between those who share protected characteristics and those who do not. In this sense, many museums, galleries, archives and heritage organisations have a duty to advance inclusion. Trans inclusion can, and must, sit squarely alongside their commitment and their work to be anti-racist, to challenge sexism and support women’s rights, to combat ableism and all forms of prejudice and discrimination.

Case law in 2021 has meant that ‘gender critical’ beliefs (‘broadly speaking, the belief that sex is biologically determined, binary and immutable’’) alongside other beliefs – can now be protected under the Equality Act. This, alongside more recent changes in the law outlined below, has generated some uncertainties and challenges for those striving to create and maintain organisational cultures and environments that are inclusive and safe for trans people. This context is proving confusing for leaders in cultural organisations and has led to conversations and confrontations that cultural professionals are not always equipped to take part in or resolve. This guidance sets out to offer support by drawing in insights from legal scholars to provide greater clarity around the law, including important details that can help you understand and respond to issues, disagreements and upset, should they arise.

Recognising that the law cannot provide all the answers and that we also need other perspectives and forms of knowledge to drive this work, the guidance also includes an ethical framework – informed by leading-edge scholarship and practice around museum ethics and inclusion – which sets out a series of principles and actions that you can take forward. Museums, galleries, archives and heritage organisations have been very aware for a long time that, alongside their obligations to comply with the Equality Act, they have ethical responsibilities and opportunities to generate inclusive public spaces and workplaces. Trans-inclusive practice is a key component of this work.